Cronberg Bros. v. Johnson
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kh&ball, Justice.
In an action of trover, the plaintiff, Samuel W. Johnson, claimed damages for the conversion of 907 head of his ewe sheep by the defendant, Cronberg Bros., Inc., a corporation. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict for plaintiff, and from the judgment upon the verdict the defendant brings error.
In the spring of 1917 both plaintiff and defendant were engaged extensively in the business of sheep raising. They ranged their sheep in the same vicinity, some of their lands adjoining. There was evidence that on April 28, 29, and 30, 1917, plaintiff’s sheep, consisting almost…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Green v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
- Dewey v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Daggett v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Henderson v. ColemanWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
- Goltra v. PenlandOregon Supreme Court · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GoettinaWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
- Brasel & Sims Construction Co. v. Neuman Transit Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Diamond Management Corp. v. Empire Gas Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Long v. ForbesWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- Huber v. ThomasWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.