Legal Opinion

McHugh v. McHugh

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1988No. 16703PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTLEY, Justice.

Berit Elizabet McHugh appeals the trial court’s order refusing to entertain her motion to award her a portion of respondent Richard McHugh’s military retirement pension as community property, pursuant to the Uniformed Services’ Former Spouses’ Protection Act (USFSPA) 10 U.S.C. § 1408.

Berit and Richard McHugh were married in 1972. In 1979, Mrs. McHugh filed for divorce, while both parties were domiciled in Idaho, listing “Navy Retirement” as an asset to be divided which had been acquired during marriage. Richard McHugh filed an Answer and Counterclaim, section V of which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Ramsey v. RamseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rudd v. RuddIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Boesiger v. FreerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Casas v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. Michelle Faye McIntoshIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Allen v. AllenSuperior Court of Guam · 2012
  4. Allen v. AllenSuperior Court of Guam · 2012
  5. Jones v. ChristensenDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API