Legal Opinion
Friends of Endangered Species, Inc. v. Jantzen
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 20, 1984No. C-83-3837 SWPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Defendants brought a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 56 noticed for February 8, 1984. Because of a misunderstanding with regard to the scheduling of defendants’ motion for summary judgment, plaintiff arrived late for oral argument. Rather than reschedule hearing, or grant defendant’s motion, we invited both parties to supplement their briefs with any additional facts and legal arguments they might have intended to raise at oral argument. Both parties have now done so. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Trout Unlimited v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Cabinet Mountains Wilderness/scotchman's Peak Grizzly Bears v. R. Max Peterson, U. S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Life Of The Land v. BrinegarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Plaintiffs v. The Board of Oil and Gas Conservation of the State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Friends of Endangered Species, Inc. v. JantzenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Friends Of Endangered Species, Inc. v. JantzenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- National Wildlife Federation v. BabbittDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2000
- Environment Now! v. EspyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.