Legal Opinion

Viad Corp v. United States Steel Corporation

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 31, 2017No. A17A0937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Branch, Judge.

*609 From 1908 to 1937, the predecessors of appellant Viad Corp produced sulfuric acid and a waste product known as "pyrite cinders," which are mostly iron oxide but also contain lead and arsenic, at a 25-acre plant in Albany, Georgia. In April 1968, Viad's predecessors agreed to sell the property to U. S. Steel (in a "Sale Contract"), with the sale memorialized on June 29, 1968 (in an "Assumption Agreement"). Under the reciprocal indemnification provisions of the Assumption Agreement, Viad's predecessors agreed to indemnify U.S. Steel's predecessor for liabilities "result[ing] from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Ashley II of Charleston LLC v. PCS Nitrogen IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  3. BBL-MCCARTHY, LLC v. Baldwin Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Fina, Inc. v. ArcoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Willesen v. Ernest Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
  3. Arthur Sherwood v. Raldoman WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  4. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2024
  5. Milliken & Company v. Georgia Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API