Sherwood v. Williams

*400Plaintiff Raldoman Williams was injured when a car lift in the shop where he was having his car repaired was lowered onto his foot. On appeal from a jury verdict in Williams's favor, the owner and operator of the shop, Arthur Sherwood, argues that the trial court *401erred when, inter alia, it denied his motion for judgment notwithstanding the *143verdict ("j.n.o.v.") and when it charged the jury as to the constructive knowledge of hazards including a foreign substance. We find no error and affirm.

On appeal from the denial of a motion for j.n.o.v., we will affirm the verdict if there is any evidence…