Legal Opinion
Woodward & Dickerson, Inc. v. Yoo Hoo Beverage Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 26, 1980No. Civ. A. 78-4160PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Woodward & Dickerson, Inc., instituted this action for damages against the defendant, Yoo Hoo Beverage Company, Inc. (Beverage) for the alleged breach of three contracts involving the sale of cocoa powder by the plaintiff to Beverage. Beverage joined Yoo Hoo Africa, Ltd. (Africa) as a third party defendant pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 14. This action, which was based on diversity jurisdiction, was tried before a jury from April 21, 1980 to April 29, 1980. The jury answered interrogatories that resulted in a verdict in favor of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Krivo Industrial Supply Company and Morgan Precision Parts, Inc. v. National Distillers and Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Lawrence B. Thomas, and Cross-Appellant v. E. J. Korvette, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Blofsen v. CUTAIARSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Botwinick v. Credit Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- E.J. Stewart, Inc. v. Aitken Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Marks v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Marian Bank v. International Harvester Credit Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Davis v. R. H. Dwyer Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Whitmore v. Bobst Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.