Lyles v. Alabama State Docks Terminal Ry.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Daniel Lyles appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, the Alabama State Docks Terminal Railway ("Railway").
A summary judgment is properly entered "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, . . . show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." Rule 56(c)(3), Ala.R.Civ.P. Once the moving party has made a prima facie showing that no genuine issue of material fact exists, the burden shifts to the nonmoving party to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gary C. Lancaster v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- O'Donnell v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Glass v. Birmingham Southern RR Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Pulley v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Rogers v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Walker v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000