Legal Opinion

Lyles v. Alabama State Docks Terminal Ry.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 18, 1998No. 1971280PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Daniel Lyles appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, the Alabama State Docks Terminal Railway ("Railway").

A summary judgment is properly entered "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, . . . show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." Rule 56(c)(3), Ala.R.Civ.P. Once the moving party has made a prima facie showing that no genuine issue of material fact exists, the burden shifts to the nonmoving party to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Gary C. Lancaster v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. O'Donnell v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Glass v. Birmingham Southern RR Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Pulley v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Rogers v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Walker v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API