Legal Opinion

Gee v. Kerestes

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 2010No. Civil Action 09-825PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Edward Gee (“Gee”) petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I referred the petition to Chief Magistrate Judge Rueter for a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Rueter recommended that I deny the petition. Gee filed objections. For the reasons discussed below, I will overrule Gee’s objections, adopt the R & R with one exception, and deny the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

II. Background

The R & R recites the factual and procedural background of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sneed v. BeardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. CASH v. WETZELDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Com. v. King, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. JOHNSON v. KERESTESDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API