Gee v. Kerestes
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Edward Gee (“Gee”) petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I referred the petition to Chief Magistrate Judge Rueter for a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Rueter recommended that I deny the petition. Gee filed objections. For the reasons discussed below, I will overrule Gee’s objections, adopt the R & R with one exception, and deny the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
II. Background
The R & R recites the factual and procedural background of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sneed v. BeardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- CASH v. WETZELDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. King, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- JOHNSON v. KERESTESDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023