Sneed v. Beard
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ii. Failure to Adequately Cross-Examine Three Prosecution Witnesses
Petitioner also contends that his trial counsel failed to adequately cross-examine three prosecution witnesses: Zeb Liverman, Charles Russell, and Robert Henderson.
Zeb Liverman
Petitioner claims that counsel failed to adequately cross-examine Zeb Liverman, one of the prosecution's witnesses who claimed to be present at the shooting gallery on October 13-14, 1980, about his drug use and prior convictions. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, however, reasonably concluded that this claim has no merit, stating that:
This assertion is…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- DANIELS v. GARMANDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- EARLE v. SMITHDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- EVANS v. RANSOMEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- JAMES v. KAUFFMANDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- LEE v. TICEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.