Legal Opinion

Sneed v. Beard

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 6, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-5328PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ii. Failure to Adequately Cross-Examine Three Prosecution Witnesses

Petitioner also contends that his trial counsel failed to adequately cross-examine three prosecution witnesses: Zeb Liverman, Charles Russell, and Robert Henderson.

Zeb Liverman

Petitioner claims that counsel failed to adequately cross-examine Zeb Liverman, one of the prosecution's witnesses who claimed to be present at the shooting gallery on October 13-14, 1980, about his drug use and prior convictions. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, however, reasonably concluded that this claim has no merit, stating that:

This assertion is…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. DANIELS v. GARMANDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. EARLE v. SMITHDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. EVANS v. RANSOMEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. JAMES v. KAUFFMANDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. LEE v. TICEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API