Rhoades v. Finn
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.
The above cases were consolidated and the facts and testimony therein are the same; and on appeal can be disposed of by reference to the first above-named case.
In a negligence action for damages the jury rendered a verdict of no cause of action. Plaintiff appeals, claiming that the verdict is against the great weight of the evidence and assigns error on the failure of the court to give certain requested instructions. It is further claimed that the court erred in giving repetitious instructions to the advantage of defendant, and that a new trial should have been granted because of the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Grist v. Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. Marvil Package Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- Francis v. RumseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Christensen v. KelleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Stabler v. CopelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.