Oskin v. Johnson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1ConcurrenceJustice Hearn
Respectfully, I concur in part and dissent in part. While I ultimately agree with the majority that the Statute of Elizabeth cannot be invoked to set aside this assignment, I believe the majority adopts too narrow a view of the statute in the process. Furthermore, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that Robert Oskin, Glenn Small, and Freddie Kanos (collectively, Appellants), have not shown that J. Conner, LLC was the alter-ego of Michael Brown. I would therefore hold that J. Conner’s payment to South Carolina Bank and Trust (SCB & T) satisfied the note and mortgage.
*403I
I first turn to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Colleton County Taxpayers Ass'n v. School District of Colleton CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Gibson v. LoveSupreme Court of Florida · 1851
- Drury Development Corp. v. Foundation InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Gay v. AriailSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Mid-South Management Co. v. Sherwood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.