Legal Opinion
Calloway v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 3, 1986No. 09 83 004 CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKSHIRE, Justice.
In a previous opinion filed May 2, 1984, we remanded this cause for a new trial. Calloway v. State, 700 S.W.2d 3 (Tex.App. —Beaumont 1984, pet. granted). As we viewed and analyzed the record, there was a reasonable issue as to conflict of interest indicated because of the defense attorney’s representation of “one of the co-defendants”.
Trial counsel stated:
“[MR. HARPER:] ... I firmly believe that there is a conflict of interest that developed on or about the time that I filed this motion. And I did not recognize the conflict of interest to be as serious or would have…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hankins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Rhyne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988