Legal Opinion
Navon v. Mariculture Products Ltd.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 29, 2008No. Civil 3:08cv628 (JBA)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REFER AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND OR ABSTAIN
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ruth Navon is claiming damages under state law básed on a promissory note issued by Mariculture Products Ltd. (“MPL”) in the early 1990s. MPL and Mariculture Products Corp. (“MPC”) were together part of a business venture by Gershon Navon, Ruth’s husband. Ger-shon’s estate is now the subject of an involuntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding, in which Richard Belford is the trustee. Before the Court are: (1) a motion to refer the case to the bankruptcy court filed by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bankruptcy Services, Inc. v. Ernst & Young (In Re CBI Holding Co.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- In Re United States Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Simon, II v. NavonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McKinstry v. SergentDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
- In Re Sw Bach & Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Togut v. RBC Dain Correspondent Services (In re Bach)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- D'Iberville Promenade, LLC v. CBL-D'Iberville Member, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022