Legal Opinion

Eclectic Investment, LLC v. Patterson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2015No. CC 07019L3; CA A150458; SC S062247PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

Petitioner on review, Jackson County (the county), seeks reconsideration of our opinion in Eclectic Investment, LLC v. Patterson, 357 Or 25, 346 P3d 468 (2015), in which we affirmed the Court of Appeals and trial court decisions denying the county’s common-law indemnity claim. We concluded that, “[i]n cases in which the Oregon comparative negligence statutes apply and in which jurors allocate fault — and thereby responsibility — for payment of damages between tortfeasors, and each tortfeasor’s liability is several only, a judicially created means of allocating fault and responsibility is not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Astoria v. Astoria & Columbia River R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Eclectic Investmetn, LLC v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 2015

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Willie v. Amerada Hess Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  3. Grimstad v. KnudsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Farnworth v. RossettoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API