Carusone v. American Colony Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
The only questions are: Did the local agent, who wrote the policy, have such authority that his acts and oral declarations to the insured make out a waiver on the principle of estoppel of the provision in the policy requiring proofs of loss to be filed within sixty days from the time of the fire, and if he had such authority did his acts and statements amount to a waiver?
The answer to the first question in the negative makes unnecessary the determination of the second question.
In Quinlan v. Providence Washington Ins. Co. (133 N. Y. 356) the local agent informed the insured that “ He need take…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Satz v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Hessler v. North River InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Bollard v. . New York Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.