Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hecht v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 18, 1932No. H-129PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, Judge.

The plaintiff brings this suit to recover $66,217.05 with interest, alleged to have been overpaid on his taxes for the year 1919. This overpayment is alleged to have arisen as follows:

The plaintiff for many years has been a dealer in hides and skins in the city of New York. The plaintiff has a son, George J. Hecht, who was graduated at Cornell University with a.degree of Bachelor of Arts, pursuing the ordinary course for that degree, and who had been in 1917 serving on the Bureau of Research of the War Trade Board, working on statistics of hides and skins and tanning materials.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Builders Steel Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  2. Nutrena Mills, Inc. v. Kansas State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Samuel Heath Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  4. Wyandotte County Gas Co. v. State Commission of Revenue & TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Carole Accessories, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API