Legal Opinion

Seaboard Surety Co. v. H & R CONSTRUCTION CORP.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 5, 1957No. Civ. 2690PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

This suit, seeking broad relief against the defendants, arises primarily out of plaintiff’s bonding H & R Construction Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as H & R, in connection with eight contracts, most of which had to do with public work contracted for by H & R. H. C. Nelson and' Sidney A. Nelson, doing business as H. C. Nelson Investment Co., and hereinafter referred to as the Nelsons, are, together with H & R and H. H. Rohr, the principal defendants in the case. The remaining defendants are subcontractors and materialmen.

The complaint,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Byington v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Wm. Lindeke Land Co. v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Hansen v. AdentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Gay v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. H. C. Nelson, Sidney A. Nelson, and H. C. Nelson Investment Company v. Seaboard Surety Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  2. PCI/RCI v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  3. Larsen v. Consolidated Pet Foods, Inc. (In Re S & D Foods, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1992
  4. Dowdey v. Henry (In Re Washington Communications Group, Inc.)District Court, District of Columbia · 1982
  5. Alicia Ocean Transport v. Rollins Burdick Hunter of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API