Legal Opinion

Ralls v. E. R. Taylor Auto Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 2, 1947No. 31323Published

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

1. This Court certified three questions to the Supreme Court. Because . the answer to the first question was controlling, the remaining questions were not answered.

2. The headnote of the decision of the Supreme Court reads: “Where an affidavit under the Code, § 61-301, alleging one ground for dispossessing a tenant, is. followed by the words ‘or and’ and then another ground, it is not a positive allegation of either ground, and is subject to an oral motion to dismiss.”

Decided May 2, 1947. 'J. T. Thomasson, for plaintiff in error. Duke Davis, Wilson Darden, Horace E. Richter, contra.

3. In the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doyal v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Ralls v. E. R. Taylor Auto CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Brafman & Son v. AsherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API