Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. New-Albany & Salem Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1856PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The complaint charges that the appellees, •who were the defendants, were engaged in ballasting their road with sand and gravel, and for that purpose had in use a train of cars called “the gravel train;” that a number of laborers, the plaintiff being one of them, were employed in excavating gravel from certain banks, loading the same in said cars, and afterwards unloading and distributing it upon the defendant’s road; that many of said laborers, of whom the plaintiff was one, boarded and lodged in the town of Orawfordsville, distant two miles from the gravel banks, who, by agreement with the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & Greenfield Rapid Transit Co. v. ForemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Columbus & Indianapolis Central Railway Co. v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Peterson v. Seattle Traction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WelchTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Gormley v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API