Department of Fish and Game of the State of California v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
In our previous decision in this case we remanded to the Commission “for further proceedings, not inconsistent with this opinion, relating to the cost of operating and maintaining the fish trapping and egg taking facilities, and for such clarification of Article 50 as it may desire to make.” (Pacific Power & Light Co. v. FPC, 1964, 333 F.2d 689, 697.) Certiorari was sought by the Department of Fish and Game of the State of California. This was opposed by the Commission on the ground, inter alia, that the case was not ripe for review, the issues raised being premature…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Federal Power Commission v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Utah Power & Light Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Pacific Power & Light Company, Department of Fish and Game of the State of California v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Boston Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Sierra Ass'n for Environment v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Kentucky Utilities Co. v. United States Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Sierra Association For Environment v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.