Legal Opinion

Motley v. Colvin

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 4, 2014No. 13 Cv. 7856(JGK)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:

The pro se plaintiff, Bernadette Motley, seeks review of the final decision of the defendant, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), that the plaintiff does not qualify for Disabled Adult Child (“DAC”) benefits because she has not established that the insured, John H. Torrence, was her father. Tr. 12-14.1 The defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c).

I

On September 1, 2011, the plaintiff submitted an application for DAC benefits, basing her claim on her relationship to Torrence, who she…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Selian v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. William E. Butts v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. William E. Butts v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Thomas v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API