Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peterson v. Robison

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1954No. S. F. 19061Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent.

The majority opinion is based upon several false assumptions as well as misstatements of both fact and law.

It appears to be conceded that the arrest of plaintiff, insofar as it was brought about by the acts and conduct of defendant, was unlawful. This must be conceded because an arrest can be made by a private person only,

“1. For a public offense committed or attempted in his presence.
“2. When the person arrested has committed a felony although not in his presence.
“3. When a felony has been in fact committed, and he has reasonable cause for believing the person arrested to have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turner v. MellonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Sebring v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. City of Long Beach v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API