Legal Opinion
Horne v. Florida Real Estate Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 28, 1964No. E-390PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLS, Judge.
Defendants Horne and Martin have petitioned for writ of certiorari to review an order of the Real Estate Commission denying a motion to quash count three of an information alleging that defendant Horne is guilty of conduct prohibited by Chapter 475, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.
The motion to quash was directed to count three only. This count realleges all matters set forth in counts one and two so the facts contained therein are briefly reviewed here. Count one alleges that defendant Martin (a registered broker) and one Hampton Cox were the active firm members of Florida Real Estate…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Ahern v. Florida Real Estate Commission Ex Rel. O'KelleySupreme Court of Florida · 1942
- Holland v. Florida Real Estate Commission Ex Rel. LinesbaughSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Cohen v. Florida Real Estate CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brod v. JerniganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Reid v. Florida Real Estate CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Trafalgar Developers, Ltd. v. GENEVA INVEST. LTD.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Cannon v. Florida Real Estate CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Rifkin v. Florida Real Estate CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.