Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 23, 1982No. 04-81-00056-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTU, Justice.

The offense is aggravated robbery by using or exhibiting a deadly weapon.1 Punishment was assessed by the jury at thirty (30) years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction and complains of prosecutorial overreaching in three separate instances. We first address the sufficiency ground by noting that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the jury verdict, reflects the following.

On December 20, 1978, at approximately 12:15 a. m., David Goddu was working as an attendant…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Blansett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Kerns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John Berry Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2020
  2. Jose Manuel Mora v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2011
  3. Jose Manuel Mora v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API