Legal Opinion

Doxen v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 11, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The bills of exception contained in the record on this appeal relate to rulings on the admissibility of evidence in the course of a trial which resulted in the defendant’s conviction of embezzlement. The material facts of the case are undisputed. In August, 1924, William D. Simmons bought from Simon Getz a dwelling house and lot of ground in Bel Air for $1,165.50, subject to an existing mortgage on the property for $1,800, which the purchaser agreed to assume. The defendant, who was an attorney-at-law, prepared the contract of purchase. In order to enable Simmons to finance the transaction…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weeks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  2. Wolf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
  3. Jessup v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  4. Riley v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andresen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Graves v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. State v. LakeMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Folb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  5. Pickman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API