Legal Opinion

National Fire Insurance v. Hornbuckle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 23, 1933No. 22955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

Under tbe rulings in headnotes 1 and 2 (repeatedly announced by the Supreme Court and this court), the assignments of error on the exceptions pendente lite will not be passed upon.

This was a suit bn a policy of fire-insurance covering a stock of goods and store furniture and fixtures of the plaintiff. The policy contained, among other provisions, the warranty known as the “iron-safe clause.” The petition alleged that the plaintiff had complied with all the conditions of the policy. The defendant’s answer averred that the plaintiff had not complied with the “iron-safe clause” of the policy,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Clark v. Fire Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Firemen's Insurance Co. v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API