Legal Opinion · Dissent

Leach v. Farmers Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1927Published

1DissentMorling, J.

A so-called claim for preference such as this is merely one for the establishment of claimant’s ownership of property in the possession of the receiver, and a demand for decree for its restitution to claimant. Claimant is not entitled to be preferred in the payment of a liability incurred by the insolvent for the loss of claimant’s property. Claimant, to establish his right, must show: (1) The existence of some concrete fund or article or item of property (2) of which the claimant is the owner (Farnsworth v. Muscatine P. & P. I. Co., 177 Iowa 21, 30), (3) of such nature that its receipt by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Empire State Surety Co. v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. The People v. . Merchants and Mechanics' Bk.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Messenger v. Carroll Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Beard v. Independent Dist. of Pella CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  5. Hecker-Jones-Jewell Milling Co. v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API