State v. Smith
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendant, Emmanuel B. Smith, Jr., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims (1) that there was insufficient evidence to support the juiy’s verdict, (2) that the trial court improperly failed to conduct an in camera review of an arresting police officer’s personnel file and (3) that the court improperly instructed the jury to harmonize the evidence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. JanuszewskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. CeballosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. FabricatoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. WilsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.