Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Town of Flower Mound
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 29, 2005No. 2-05-030-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.
This case involves the interpretation of section 43.141(a) of the Texas Local Government Code. Tex. Loc. Gov’t Code Ann. § 43.141(a) (Vernon Supp.2004r-05). In one issue, Orric and Carole Freeman contend that the trial court erred in holding that they were not permitted to seek dis-annexation of their property from the Town of Flower Mound because they did not seek to disannex the entire area originally annexed by the Town and because they were not joined by a majority of voters in the entire originally annexed area. We affirm.
Background Facts
Over the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital v. AgborTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Cail v. Service Motors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Alexander Oil Company v. City of SeguinTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Centurion Planning Corp. v. Seabrook Venture II, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Dallas v. D.R. Horton - Texas, LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- In Re AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2006
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2006