Legal Opinion

Hilligas v. Kuns

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1910No. 15,902PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the district court for York county: Harvey D. Travis, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

This is an action for damages. Plaintiff prevailed, and defendant appeals.

The facts underlying this case are that in 1899, defendant owned a half section of unimproved, unoccupied land in Deuel county of hut little value. In that year he sold and conveyed the land by warranty deed to a Mr. Jones, and Jones sold and conveyed it to plaintiff, who resided in Lincoln county. The deeds were not recorded, and the land remained unoccupied, except as strangers to the title pastured cattle thereon. In 1906 the treasurer of Deuel county, Mr. Roudebush, noticed that taxes levied upon the land for many…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Philpot v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Johnson v. GulickNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Doremus v. HennessyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  4. Marshall v. RobertsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  5. Bannard v. DuncanNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coyle v. StopakNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Anderson v. Graham Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Ashby v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bradley v. TolsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  5. Paup v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API