Legal Opinion

Brainard v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 8, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Keolcuh District Court. — Hon. B. W. Preston, Judge. Action in equity to restrain the defendant from opening a culvert or drain across its right of way. Decree as prayed, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The land affected by the drainage in question slopes from north to south, and is crossed from east to west by defendant’s railway. The plaintiff owns the tract immediately south of the right of way, and his wife holds the title to the land adjoining on the north. At the time of the construction of the railroad, many years ago, there was a natural depression or waterway crossing the right of way at or near the point now in controversy and extending in a southerly direction to the Skunk river. *467In building its grade the company placed a culvert therein to afford passage for water making its way…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. King v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Bones v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eaves v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. Hinkle v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Stouder v. DashnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  4. O.D. King v. P. AdamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Powell v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API