Legal Opinion

Tyler Topel v. Kayla Tong

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 21, 2026No. 3:24-cv-01336Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TYLER TOPEL, CASE NO. 3:24 CV 1336 Plaintiff, v. JUDGE JAMES R. KNEPP II KAYLA TONG, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendant. ORDER INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Kayla Tong. (Doc. 23).1 Plaintiff Tyler Topel opposed (Doc. 25), and Defendant replied (Doc. 26). Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). For the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s Motion is granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND This case arises from an alleged…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API