State v. Degourville
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, following his plea of nolo contendere,1 of possession of narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b). The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained in violation of his rights under the fourth and fourteenth amendments to the United States constitution and article first, §§ 7 and 8, *774of the Connecticut constitution. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found the following facts. On March 4,1993, at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. RoseboroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. VargasConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burke v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Degourville v. Warden, No. Cv-95-0552598 (May 20, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- State v. DegourvilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996