Legal Opinion
Center for Professional Advancement v. Mazzie
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 9, 2004No. 2:03-cv-04263PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ACKERMAN, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant MetLife, Inc.’s (“MetLife”) motion for summary judgment to dismiss Plaintiff The Center for Professional Advancement’s (“CPA”) complaint for failing to comply with New Jersey’s “entire controversy” doctrine and the certification requirements of New Jersey Rule of Court 4:5-1. For the following reasons, MetLife’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.
I. Background
The parties stipulate to the following facts for purposes of the instant motion only. On June 4, 2001, Mark G. Mazzie (“Mazzie”) became…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rycoline Products, Inc. v. C & W UnlimitedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Olds v. DonnellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- James Ricketti v. Shaun BarryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. STILLWELLDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- BATISTA v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- CASINO BEACH PIER LLC v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. CITY OF OCEAN CITY, NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.