Legal Opinion
Richard Arthur Kirkham v. Whatcom County, et al.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 27, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00208Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 RICHARD ARTHUR KIRKHAM, CASE NO. 2:25-CV-208-DGE-DWC 11 Plaintiff, v. ORDER ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL 12 AND FOR A MORE DEFINITE WHATCOM COUNTY, et al., STATEMENT 13 Defendants. 14 15 This pro se prisoner civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate 16 Judge David W. Christel. Currently before the Court are two motions filed by Plaintiff Richard 17 Arthur Kirkham. In his first motion, Plaintiff seeks to compel discovery from Defendants Jessica 18 Dubek and DentALL, LLC (hereinafter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Ivins v. Corrections Corp.District Court, D. Montana · 2013