Legal Opinion

Truesdell v. Halliburton Co., Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1988No. S-2259PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This case comes before the court on two questions certified by the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. In a recent decision, we recognized a minor child’s independent cause of action for loss of parental consortium. Hibpshman v. Prudhoe Bay Supply, Inc., 734 P.2d 991 (Alaska 1987). The questions certified in this case address the retroactive effect of that decision and the applicable statute of limitations.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.

Wade Truesdell was injured while working on an oil rig in Cook Inlet on January 25, 1985. On March 12,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Theama v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Gore v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  4. Haakanson v. Wakefield Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Schreiner v. FruitAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. L.D.G., Inc. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Williams v. HookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Hickel v. HalfordAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hamilton v. BlackmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Breithaupt v. USAA Property and Casualty Insurance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API