Legal Opinion

Gestetner Holdings, PLC v. Nashua Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 10, 1992No. 91 Civ. 7293 (WCC)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge:

This petition to compel arbitration (the “Petition”) is brought pursuant to Sections 4 and 201 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 4, 201, pursuant to an arbitration provision in the Purchase Agreement between petitioner Gestetner Holdings PLC (“Gestetner”) and respondent Nashua Corporation (“Nashua”). 1

BACKGROUND

Gestetner is a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, with its principal place of business in London; England. Gestetner is engaged in, inter alia, the business of selling office machines and office…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Old Colony Trust Co. v. City of OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Mcallister Brothers, Inc. v. A & S Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seed Holdings, Inc. v. Jiffy International ASDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Wilson v. Subway Sandwiches Shops, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. E TRADE FINANCIAL CORP. v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. Severstal U.S. Holdings, LLC v. RG Steel, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. Alstom v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API