Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 29, 1991No. 01-88-00533-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

MIRABAL, Justice.

The Court of Criminal Appeals has vacated our judgment in Lee v. State 1 and remanded the cause to us so that we might consider whether the jury foreman’s testimony at the motion for new trial hearing was admissible under Tex.R.Crim.Evid. 606(b). Lee v. State, 791 S.W.2d 141, 142 (Tex.Crim.App.1990).

A jury convicted appellant of burglary of a habitation while armed with a deadly weapon.2 The jury assessed punishment at 55 years confinement. Appellant filed a motion for new trial based on jury misconduct, claiming the jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Baldonado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  3. Bader v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  4. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reyna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  2. Zaid Adnan Najar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API