Legal Opinion

Bradford Hospital v. Shalala

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-171 ERIEPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This is a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1395. Plaintiff Bradford Hospital seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services denying Plaintiffs request for a rede-termination of its hospital-specific rate as untimely. Presently pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Plaintiffs motion is granted and the Defendant’s motion is denied.

I. Background

A. The Medicare Statute and Its Regulations

In 1965, Congress enacted Medicare, which is a federally…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Auburn Regional Medical Center v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Auburn Regional Medical Center v. LeavittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Auburn Regional Medical Center v. LeavittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. SCOTT v. WILKIEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API