Legal Opinion

Parrott v. Abernathy

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1931No. File No. 6936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C.

In this action respondent Parrott seeks to recover from Buffalo county and its treasurer a balance remaining" of the sum paid for assignments of certain tax sale certificates. In Menaugh et al. v. Elvira School District et al., 50 S. D. 311, 210 N. W. 51, this court held the lands described in the certificates to ■be no part of Elvira school district. Thereafter the owners of the land paid to the county treasurer the amount of the taxes thereon less the Elvira school district tax. The county treasurer called in respondent’s certificates, paid him $373.22 — the amount received from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ward v. Board of Commr's of Love Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Marsh v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Louisiana v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Stutsman County v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Beadle County v. HinckleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Board of County Com'rs. v. BrewerWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Federal Land Bank v. Buffalo CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API