Beadle County v. Hinckley
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Through defective tax sale proceedings had under SDC 57.11 Beadle County received a tax deed to real property of the defendants. Thereafter pursuant to a resale under SDC 57.1124 the county conveyed to plaintiff Moeller. Thereupon, Moeller and the county joined as plaintiffs in this action to determine adverse claims brought under the provisions of SDC 37.15. By their counterclaim the defendants asserted their title, assailed the validity of the tax proceedings and sale, and asked to have their title quieted. The trial court sustained the attack on the tax sale, and conditioned its decree…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clark v. DarlingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Lasell v. Yankton CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Weller v. PlattSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Coughlin v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
- W. M. Ritter Lumber Co. v. LoweWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilcox v. WesterheideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Kraft v. Carson CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Parker v. NortonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- Alexander v. HamiltonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Alexander v. HamiltonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.