Legal Opinion

United States v. Fischer

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 30, 2004No. NMCCA 200200303PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RITTER, Senior Judge:

A military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted the appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of two specifications of indecent acts with a child under the age of 16, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The appellant was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 12 months, and reduction to pay grade E-l.

We have carefully considered the record of trial, the appellant’s single assignment of error, and the Government’s response. We conclude that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and that no…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Clinton v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. InongCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  2. United States v. DodgeUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  3. United States v. HammondArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  4. United States v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  5. United States v. Sergeant MARIO I. LOPEZArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API