Legal Opinion · Dissent

Desambourg v. Board of Commissioners for the Grand Prairie Levee District

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 2, 1993No. 93-C-0167Published

1DissentDennis, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

The constitution declares that lands and improvements actually used or destroyed for levees or levee drainage purposes “shall be paid for as provided by law,” with the exception of “batture or to property the control of which is vested in the state or any political subdivision for the purpose of commerce.” La. Const, art. 6 § 42 (1974). Previously, the constitution had provided that all lands and improvements actually used or destroyed for levee or levee drainage purposes, “shall be paid for at a price not to exceed the assessed value of the preceding year; provided,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wemple v. EasthamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. General Box Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Boyce Cottonseed Oil Mfg. Co. v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Pruyn v. Nelson Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  5. Ward v. Board of Levee Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API