Legal Opinion
Hartman v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 1988No. 17094PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
PART ONE: PROCEDURAL CONTEXT
A.AMENDED COMPLAINT
On September 12,1986, plaintiff-appellee, Doyle Hartman (Hartman), filed his amended complaint against defendant-appellant, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso), alleging that El Paso had intentionally and maliciously breached various gas purchase contracts entered into between Hartman as seller-producer and El Paso as purchaser-pipeline. Hartman also alleged certain tortious conduct, violations of the New Mexico Antitrust Act, and sought a permanent injunction requiring El Paso to abide by and perform its obligations…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Exxon Corp. v. EagertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- von Bulow v. von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Specialty Beverages, L.L.C v. Pabst Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- State ex rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- STATE EX REL. ALLSTATE INS. v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Public Service Co. of New Mexico v. LyonsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Gold Standard, Inc. v. American Barrick Resources Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.