Legal Opinion

In Re Handy

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 17, 2000No. 98-015 & 98-016Published

1Opinion of the Court

764 A.2d 1226 (2000)

In re Paul L. HANDY (Town of Shelburne, Appellant).

In re Jolley Associates.

Nos. 98-015, 98-016.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

November 17, 2000.

Joseph S. McLean, Steven F. Stitzel, Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C., Burlington, for Town of Shelburne.

Howard J. Seaver, Greene & Seaver, Inc., Burlington, for appellant Jolley Associates.

Douglas K. Riley, Lisman & Lisman, Burlington, for appellee Handy.

Present: AMESTOY, C.J., DOOLEY, MORSE, JOHNSON and SKOGLUND, JJ.

DOOLEY, J.

In these consolidated appeals, we consider the status of zoning permit applications filed during what we will…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Kent v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Smith v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  5. In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API