Chapman v. Tiger
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion
*583Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs in error urge on rehearing that this court overlooked several of their contentions which are decisive. The appeal herein was from order of the trial court granting a new trial to certain of the defendants. In concluding that the trial court did not err, we deemed it appropriate to decide certain meritorious questions for the guidance of trial court and counsel upon another trial of the cause. The remaining contentions of plaintiffs in error will now be considered.
The first contention is, as follows:
“The granting of a new trial is error, where:
“(a)…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Woodrow v. EwingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Woodworth, County Clerk v. Town of HennesseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Mulhall v. MulhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Cox v. WarfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ashinger v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.