Legal Opinion
In Re Tardiff
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine
Decided March 3, 1992No. 19-10080PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
JAMES B. HAINES, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
On April 27,1988, Mark T. Tardiff (“Tar-diff”) sought, and was granted, relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. 1 On September 14, 1988, he received his discharge. The case was closed the next day. Tardiff moved to reopen on January 3, 1992, and immediately filed his “Motion for Revocation of Discharge and Conversion to Chapter 13.”
For the reasons set forth below, the court, having reopened the case, declines Tardiff’s request that his 1988 discharge be revoked and that the case be converted to Chapter 13. 2
DISCUSSION
When he…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re LesniakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- In Re TardiffUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1992
- In Re GrayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1993
- In Re StarlingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- In Re WyciskallaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.