Legal Opinion

Doe v. Marlington Local School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 2009No. 2007-1304PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

{¶ 1} The facts alleged in this case are disturbing. However, this case presents a purely legal issue: whether the immunity granted by R.C. Chapter 2744 applies to bar liability of a school district for negligent supervision of the conduct of children on a school bus. Jane and John Doe, the court-appointed custodians of Holly Roe,1 a minor, sued the Marlington Local School District Board of Education and several employees of the school district seeking damages after their daughter was sexually molested by another child on a school bus. The board moved for summary judgment and raised the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cater v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wilson v. Stark County Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Meeks v. PapadopulosOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. ClearyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Chandler v. Muskegon CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Pelletier v. Campbell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. WidmerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. BundyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. McConnell v. Dudley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Freeman v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API