Doe v. Marlington Local School District Board of Education
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.
{¶ 1} The facts alleged in this case are disturbing. However, this case presents a purely legal issue: whether the immunity granted by R.C. Chapter 2744 applies to bar liability of a school district for negligent supervision of the conduct of children on a school bus. Jane and John Doe, the court-appointed custodians of Holly Roe,1 a minor, sued the Marlington Local School District Board of Education and several employees of the school district seeking damages after their daughter was sexually molested by another child on a school bus. The board moved for summary judgment and raised the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cater v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Wilson v. Stark County Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Meeks v. PapadopulosOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ClearyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Chandler v. Muskegon CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Pelletier v. Campbell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. WidmerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. BundyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- McConnell v. Dudley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- Freeman v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.