Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices No. 185

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 13, 1965No. 185PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Court in answer to questions propounded by the Senate, under Code 1940, Tit. 13, § 34, relating to the validity of Senate Rule 19.

*523Senate Resolution No. 7

Whereas, Senate Bill 1, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, is being made the object of unlimited debate in the Alabama Senate now in session; and

Whereas, pursuant to Section 53 of the Constitution, the Senate duly adopted certain rules for its proceedings, and included among such rules was Rule 19, which governs the procedure for terminating debate, or invoking…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BallinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Crawford v. GilchristSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  3. Tayloe v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Doody v. State Ex Rel. Mobile CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Birmingham-Jefferson Civic Ctr. Auth. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Hartman v. ThompsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Jefferson County v. WeissmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API