Legal Opinion

Karen Lemke v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. Roper Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 5, 1988No. 87-1732PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge:

Karen Lemke, plaintiff in a personal injury action brought pursuant to diversity jurisdiction, appeals an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Roper Corporation (“Roper”) and Sears, Roebuck & Company (“Sears”). The court held that a prior release executed by Lemke in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) was general in nature and inured to the benefit of the defendants. Because we conclude that Lemke was entitled to contest the scope of the earlier release, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

Lem…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Radosevic v. Virginia Intermont CollegeDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1987
  2. McComb v. McCombSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Allan & Gloria Molasky v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  2. Centex Construction v. ACSTAR InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  3. Moss v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Noonan v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. First Security Federal Savings Bank, Inc. v. McQuilkenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API